Maclennan Investment Group, Inc.

925.385.8798

  • Home
  • Services
    • Commercial Property Management
    • Commercial and Industrial Leasing and Sales
    • Individual Investors
    • Note Purchases
  • About
    • Peter Maclennan
    • Book Peter
  • Blog
  • Investments
    • Contra Costa County Duplex, Triplex, and Fourplex
    • Commercial & Industrial Properties for Sale
    • Office, Retail, & Industrial Properties for Lease
    • Alameda County Duplex, Triplex, and Fourplex Invesment Properties
  • Articles
    • Interest Rates and Investment Property Values
    • 5 Mistakes Instant Millionaires Make
  • Contact
    • eNewsletter
  • Note Purchases
  • Commercial Loans
You are here: Home / Blog

January 24, 2012 by Peter Maclennan 3 Comments

Why Young Professionals Should Buy a Duplex, Triplex, or Fourplex

In my last post I detailed Why Young Professionals Should NOT Buy a House. In this post I will explain why your first home should be shared with some tenants.

The author and radio host Dave Ramsey has said that a home or personal dwelling is a stake in the ground to which the owner is chained. Your life will most likely revolve around the area where you buy a home. You will work nearby, play nearby, and raise a family where you plant this stake. What if you want to change any of these items?

Often, professionals just beginning their career do not plan to spend their life in the same location that they find their first job. The energy of big city life is not as appealing when you have to raise a family. Their first job is a dead end and a graduate degree is required for advancement. Or you find great success in your career but the next promotion is in another state or another country. What do you do with that condo or fixer of a home you bought?

Financially Wise

Imagine instead that you bought a fourplex (a single building with four separate living units). This fourplex in Concord, CA is a current example. Argyll Avenue – Fourplex

The property is listed for $375,000. According to the listing agent the property has 2 -2 bedroom units and 2 – 1 bedroom units. Let’s figure 3% for closing costs and fees for a total of about $386,000. Our first-time home buyer decides to make an offer at list price with 10% down. Their loan amount will be $347,000.

A loan of $347,000 at 5% interest will have a payment of $1,863 per month. Property taxes and insurance will add roughly an additional $612 per month. If our home buyer mows his own grass and does repairs himself, he likely won’t have many other expenses beyond the occasional repair or vacancy. The total expenses for the property will be roughly $2,475 per month.

According to the listing agent, the 2 bedrooms rent for $1250 each per month and the 1 bedrooms rent for $850. To be safe let’s knock $150 off of each of those and say that the 2 beds will fetch $1100 and the 1 bedrooms will get $700. Our industrious and frugal buyer doesn’t have a roommate and decides to live in a one bedroom unit. His gross income from the property will be 2 x $1,100 = $2,200 plus $700 = $2,900. If we imagine that each of the rented units will be vacant for 10% of the year, this would reduce his gross income by $242 per month. His or her gross income will be $2,658 per month.

In review, our home buyer will be receiving $2,658 per month in rent and expenses will be roughly $2,475 per month. The net income to our home owner will be $183 per month and he will be living rent free.

Besides living rent free there will likely be some tax benefits to our home owner. Cost recovery or depreciation can be claimed on the rented units. The owner may be able to offset taxes on earned income.

If our intrepid home buyer decides to pay down the mortgage by paying “rent” of $700 per month, the home buyer could apply $883 to principal each month ($183 in cash flow).

Assuming the fourplex does not increase in value at all the value would be $375,000 at the end of 5 years. The outstanding principal would be a shade under $260,000. The home buyer has equity of almost $115,000. Calculating selling and closing costs at 8% of the gross fourplex value ($30,000), our investor has net equity of $85,000 to roll into his next purchase. Our investor could refinance the property at 80% LTV and pull out $40,000 in equity to purchase the next investment property.

Flexibility

Buying a fourplex has provided the investor with some flexibility. We assumed that the investor lived in a 1 bedroom unit. If the investor gets a roommate or marries, they could move to one of the two bedroom units without having to buy something else.

If our first-time buyer needs to relocate, the property should have enough income to pay all property expenses when fully rented. Our first-time buyer can safely transfer to another city without worrying about selling a home first.

 Conclusion

The fourplex purchase allows our hypothetical buyer a financially fit decision and a level of freedom that a SFR does not allow. It appears that an investment property, is far superior to the single family home purchase for our first time buyer. (Please do not construe this as a hard and fast rule or investment advice.)

Call me at (925) 385-8798 to see if we can find a duplex or fourplex that fits your investment needs.

Share the love:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: Benefits of Real Estate Investing, Real Estate Investing Tagged With: Argyll Avenue, Concord, concord ca, first time home, first time home buyer, fourplex, young professionals

June 2, 2011 by Peter Maclennan Leave a Comment

Why Young Professionals Should NOT Buy a House

If you are a young professional with a high paying job, you have many things working in your favor. Lots of disposable income. Lots of freedom. Lots of options.

Here are three reasons you should not buy a house/condo if you are in this stage of life:

Real Estate Ties You Down

You decide to buy a nice little home in Walnut Creek, CA. Your career starts to take off. A headhunter contacts you with your dream job in Boston. You would love to take it, but what do you do with your home? Do you sell it? Can you sell it? Do you rent it? Do you want to be a landlord on a home in California while you are in Boston?

As one radio host said, “Owning real estate is placing a stake in the ground.” It is a financial obligation that can limit your options and limits your freedom.

Your Spouse Won’t Like It

Let’s say you buy that little two bedroom house in Walnut Creek. One day while walking your dog in the Dog Park, you see the most beautiful creature on two legs. Your whirlwind romance leads to a proposal and wedding plans.

As you begin making plans for life after marriage, you are deciding on where to live. Your spouse begins to point out the deficiencies in your first house. It only has two bedrooms, where are you going to put Jack and Jill when they come along? The kitchen is too small. The bathroom only has one sink. Where are the in-laws going to stay when they visit? Why did you paint the kitchen that shade of blue?

Your options are to remodel or to sell your existing house and buy something new. Do you really want this hassle while planning a wedding?

Odds are that the person you marry won’t have the exact tastes that you do. The house you thought was ideal, is not their ideal. It is a much better decision to buy something together that you both enjoy.

It is Not the Wisest Financial Choice

Imagine a young farmer. He just bought his first plot of land. He needs to plant his fields for the harvest and he needs to build his first house. However, he only has enough capital (money) available to do one or the other. Should he buy seed for his fields or buy lumber to build the home? Which would you choose?

Hopefully, you chose the seed. Seed provides more income for the coming years. Seeds will allow the farmer to have a future in the farming business. Lumber may have provided shelter, but it didn’t produce any lasting return to the farmer.

In many ways buying a single family house is like a farmer buying lumber. It provides shelter, but the long-term benefit is mitigated.

There is another answer that makes sense for a young professional. If you would like to hear more about this solution call me at (925) 385-8798.

 

Share the love:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: Contra Costa Real Estate, Real Estate Investing Tagged With: Accumulation Phase, American Dream, Real Estate Investor, Young Professional

January 11, 2011 by Peter Maclennan 1 Comment

Risk: Getting Your Money Back Guaranteed?

I have been reading Investing for the Future by Larry Burkett on investing principles. I was struck by the author’s clarity in defining risk.

Almost without exception the degree of risk is rated based on the guaranteed return of the principle, not how much earnings the investment might yield.

The key factor in evaluating an investment’s risk is: Will I get my money back?

An investment that could lose lots of money, should provide the investor with a greater reward for their willingness to take that risk.  Conversely, “safe” investments provide less reward to investors, because they have a greater certainty of getting their money back.

This explains why savings accounts are bearing such a low rate of return. The federal government has guaranteed that savings accounts up to $250,000 will be made whole, by the FDIC. Investors in savings accounts are taking almost no risk, so they get almost no reward or return.

If you are interested in earning a higher yield on your savings, please feel free to contact me at (925) 385-8798.

Share the love:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: CA Real Estate, Real Estate Investing Tagged With: Commercial Real Estate Investing, Investment Decisions, Real Estate Investment, Real Estate Investor

June 17, 2010 by Peter Maclennan Leave a Comment

Buildings in Oakland, Berkeley, and Concord Enter Foreclosure Process

The Contra Costa Times is reporting that More East Bay buildings in mortgage default.

Specifically, Jackson Center at 1111 Jackson Street in Oakland and Berkeley Tower at 2120 University Ave in Berkeley.

The bank seeks to foreclose a delinquent loan totaling $47.1 million. The affiliate of Portland, Ore.-based Scanlan Kemper Bard, commonly known as SKB, bought the buildings and the vacant lot for $61.5 million in 2007.

Ouch! That means that SKB is willing to right off almost $15 million in invested capital on these deals.

In an article from April 26, 2010 the Contra Costa Times reported that One Concord Center was also in the foreclosure process.

SKB willingly turning over the keys to the property in Oakland and Berkeley means that they do not see a resurgence in value in the near future. Expecting a near term turn around is unrealistic.

Share the love:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: Bay Area Real Estate News, Contra Costa Real Estate Tagged With: Bay Area, East Bay

May 21, 2010 by Peter Maclennan Leave a Comment

The Hidden Tax on Savers

Occasionally I pop over to Yahoo! Finance to check on the stock market’s behavior for the day. Once of the other features on the website is commentary from financial advisors.

Today, Laura Rowley had an article entitled Starving for Yield on Savings. She writes:

Americans who chose to save instead of buying homes they could not afford or cashing out their equity to splurge on luxuries during the real estate boom need a Robin Hood at the Fed, because they’re the ones getting robbed to pay for the recovery. Conservative places to park cash — savings, money markets and certificates of deposit — are still paying well below the inflation rate of 2.2 percent. As of this week, savings accounts are averaging returns of 0.20 percent; one-year CDs are yielding 0.77 percent, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

“The Fed is determined to keep rates very low, and while it’s painted as fiscal stimulus I think it’s really a stealth bailout of the banks,” says Richard Barrington, a certified financial analyst and expert with the bank comparison site Money-Rates.com. U.S. savers have lost $140 billion in purchasing power to inflation over the 12 months ending in March, according to a Money-Rates study released last month.

A Hidden Tax

Effectively, the government through the Federal Reserve has placed a hidden “tax” on those of us who save money. The saver’s hard earned cash is being used by the government to grow the balance sheet of banks across the country.

I was introduced to this idea through a Maura O’Connor, a veteran real estate attorney speaking at an event in Oakland, CA.

The tax takes money from the savers and investors and transfers it to the banks. Banks use the deposits in savings accounts, CD’s, and money market accounts to borrow 10 times the deposited amount from the Federal Reserve at 0.25%. The banks then invest that money in US Treasuries and earn 3% on the larger amount.

Would you pay $3.50 to earn $26.50? I sure would! And the banks will too!

Real Estate As An Alternative

While we could debate the ethical nature of this scenario, we won’t do that here. The question for the savers becomes: Are you going to take this?

If you have been keeping your money “safe” in a CD, money market, or savings account, you have alternatives to the low return you are getting on your cash. There are a variety of real estate investments that you could own that would generate a higher return than what you are getting now. They also are a better hedge against inflation than cash.

If you are interested, please call me at (925) 385-8798.

P.S. You can invest money in IRA accounts as well.

Share the love:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: Benefits of Real Estate Investing, Real Estate Investing Tagged With: Investment Decisions, Real Estate Investment, Retirement Goals

February 5, 2010 by Peter Maclennan Leave a Comment

Downtown Pittsburg Project to Resume

Vidrio Mixed Use Development in Pittsburg, CA - Architectural Design

3D Architectural Rendering of Vidrio

The Contra Costa Times is reporting Construction to resume on stalled Pittsburg project.

After 18 months of inactivity, construction on a housing and retail project regarded as the centerpiece of Pittsburg’s downtown revitalization could resume next week.

Vidrio as the project was named by developer A.F. Evans has been under construction since 2006. The developer defaulted on the original loan from Union Bank in August of 2008.

A.F. Evans filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March of 2009. A.F. Evans also developed 901 Jefferson Street in Oakland which went to foreclosure and was bought by Madison Park Financial Co.

The City of Pittsburg began negotiating with Union Bank to buy the debt in October of 2009. Escrow for the sale of the debt was just closed last week.

The Contra Costa Times article says that the City of Pittsburg has already spent $26 million towards this project.

The article indicates that the 75 units are listed for sale at an average price of $152,230 per unit, for a gross sale value of $11.4 million. Less than half the cost of the city’s investment.

This looks to be a costly investment for the City of Pittsburg.

Share the love:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: Bay Area Real Estate News, Contra Costa Real Estate Tagged With: Bay Area, Commercial Real Estate Investing, Contra Costa County, East Bay

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 18
  • Next Page »

Commercial Real Estate Search

Commercial Real Estate

Top Posts & Pages

  • Interest Rates and Investment Property Values
  • Calculating Net Operating Income or NOI
  • Alameda County Duplex, Triplex, and Fourplex Invesment Properties

Listings

Commercial Real Estate Financing

Commercial Real Estate Financing

Peter Maclennan

Real Estate Broker
CA DRE #01801793
Twitter: @MaclennanInvest
Facebook: Maclennan Investment Group
[More …]

Topics

  • Bay Area Real Estate News
  • Benefits of Real Estate Investing
  • CA Real Estate
  • Commercial Leasing
  • Concord Real Estate
  • Contra Costa Real Estate
  • Industrial Real Estate
  • Investment Property
  • Listing
  • Martinez Real Estate
  • Mrs.' Questions
  • Real Estate Investing
  • Retirement Freedom
  • Seasons Greetings
  • Tenant Representation
  • Walnut Creek

Recent Posts

  • Recent Real Estate Transactions Overview
  • LEASED: Light Industrial in Bay Point, CA
  • Happy Independence Day!
  • Wishing You a Blessed Christmas & 2023!
  • For Lease! Antioch Industrial Building

Company Profile

Welcome to Maclennan Investment Group, Inc., your East Bay Area real estate investment advisors. Maclennan Investment Group assists buyers and sellers of real estate maximize the investment potential of their real estate assets.

Learn More about us.
Offering real estate services in the communities of: Walnut Creek, Concord, Pleasant Hill, Martinez, Alamo, Lafayette, and surrounding cities.

Commercial Financing

Commercial Financing
Disclaimer: Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. This site is not meant to offer legal or tax advice.

Equal Housing Opportunity

Contact Us:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

925.385.8798

Maclennan Investment Group, Inc.
3380 Vincent Rd, Ste HUB
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
p. (925) 385-8798
Licensed Broker in the State of California, DRE#01871809
Equal Housing Opportunity
Find us on Yelp!
Check out Maclennan Investment Group, Inc. on Yelp

Copyright © 2025 · Maclennan Investment Group, Inc.